In civil cases, the plaintiff carries the burden of proof. In criminal cases, the government (prosecutors) carry the burden of proof. The burden of proof describes the legal requirement that establishes which party must present evidence to prove or defeat a claim, in regard to facts and evidence required. What is the Difference in the Burden of Proof between Criminal and Civil Cases? If the defendant must go to trial, then they will hope for a verdict in their favor. The defendant will attempt to dismiss this case prior to a trial, or submit to a settlement with the plaintiff (a negotiated agreement). In a civil case, the plaintiff will seek monetary damages or an injunction (an order not to do something by the court), or specific performance (an order to do something by the court), in an attempt to restore the plaintiff to feeling “whole,” again. If the defendant must go to trial, then they will hope for a “not guilty” verdict, in order to be set free from their criminal case. The defendant will attempt to dismiss the case prior to trial, or enter a plea (which may lessen the charge and/or punishment before trial). Aside from punishment, the Government will also seek to rehabilitate the defendant, in order to deter him/her from committing future crimes and restore/reintegrate the defendant into normal life by improving their personal conditions. In a criminal case, the state or federal government will seek to punish a defendant through means such as jail time, fines, restitution, probation or even death in certain states or federally (or a combination of these consequences). They will become the “plaintiff.” Punishment On the other hand, in a civil case, the injured party or victim will file a lawsuit in civil court. In a criminal case, though they may indirectly have an impact, the injured party will typically have no say in whether or not a criminal case will be brought forth against a potential defendant. And instead of an injured victim filing the case in court, a prosecutor will do so, in order to represent the state or “the People” or “the United States.” That is because the crime itself will be considered to have affected everyone in society. In a criminal case, the “plaintiff,” (the party that brings forth the action), is the state or federal government. In order to begin to distinguish between a criminal case and a civil case and further, why an individual may be found liable in a civil case, but not guilty in a criminal case, we must first understand the distinctions present between criminal cases and civil cases. What is the Difference Between Criminal and Civil Cases? There are many differences (and some similarities), between a criminal case and a civil case. If this wrongdoing was aimed toward another individual, then they will also be faced with a civil case, which usually involves disputes between people because a legal duty or responsibility that was not adhered to. If so, they will be faced with a criminal case against the state government or federal government. When this individual committed their wrongdoing, it is likely that they broke a law. In the American legal system, when an individual commits a wrongdoing, they may be faced with the headaches of both a civil case and criminal case (the two categories of law). One of the biggest mysteries that we all want to know, but are afraid to ask: How Can Someone be Liable in a Civil Case but Not Guilty in a Criminal Case?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |